000			02085nam a22001697a 4500
003			OSt
005			20240827152412.0
008			240827b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c0
092			_20
100			_aRos, Sayumphu
245			_aCan Archaeology be a Form of Colonialism? _bExploring the Implications of the Actor-Network Theory _cSayumphu Ros
500			_aJuly 2024Herança 7(2):152-161
504			_aIncludes bibliographical reference (p. 160-170)
520			_aThis research paper examines the long-lasting impact of colonialism in archaeology through the lens of actor-network theory (ANT). It investigates how historical and contemporary power dynamics, particularly those based on Eurocentrism, continue to influence archaeological practices and knowledge production. Besides human actors, the study also emphasizes the importance of nonhuman actors, such as tools, technologies, and data, in reinforcing these asymmetrical power dynamics. Using qualitative research methods, the paper investigates how colonial powers historically dominated the field and how these practices continue to this day. A detailed literature review demonstrates that the dominance of Western narratives in archaeology frequently marginalizes local perspectives and knowledge. The paper advocates for a more collaborative and egalitarian approach to archaeological research, emphasizing the value of community involvement and knowledge co-curation. It implies that using ANT can help uncover and mitigate colonial influences by emphasizing the complex networks of human and non-human interactions that underpin archaeological practices. The study's findings advocate for a reevaluation of research methodologies in archaeology to ensure more equitable and inclusive knowledge production, fostering a better understanding of past and present cultural dynamics. Future implications include the possibility of more equitable power distributions in the field, as well as the promotion of ethical research practices that value and incorporate local voices and expertise.
942			_2ddc _cBK _n0
999			_c1845 _d1845